in dispute, not the actual respicis (manie) n.c.o.7
I and hold that premeris rented by the was dept for soldiers differ from premeres rented older's thunselors: the was dept rents in reference to building barrello &t think that from this point a news the premises
hived barracks, (just
K
are quasi
the 2.0. hiris hausporto
-
in addition to owning them both able
are
Eat rosels). Items me that the distinction be huren hiring by the war beft hiring by
an
ww
individual is vital & aports the validity 1. Rees Davies new. In fact whebrer
the intention & the Legislatione I like it
that "For premeres" must be construed as
herning
"Pemuis
in the porsession of the
Eat. by purchers, base
If so, then the premores
othersse
au
not rateable.
I saw huglad to ham that this news in
incorrect, as Lothing ahead
the W.0. get ginti mough out
السياسية
The
173
rates if the LPS. mhing is against the St.K. Govt. In the cires Lond prefer to
15. have
13.
adopt the suggestion & the A.G.
the war Deft to their legal remedy IN. Therefore uph
? That to S. MS. is not prepared to
An
interpretation of the law & thinks that it int be better to attain a decision
decision I
the Court as suffisen by the S.G.
? All that if the font decides aganist the Got the IRS will then be prepared to consider when the it will in posible to amend the law. I lam afraid one on here to
to this) ask Ty&W.o.
*
This question is abwas diffienst is
Omus mend
subject was
Disenned
Lii.
Mein uta which I annes
2740/97
Ver
in reference.
distinction,
thi
←
fins deal
/
St Helena
732/2
The
but
1. aby Body And I think
on the whole
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.